|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
Web Resources: Teen Pregnancy Facts, Abortion Facts
USA Youth Crisis Hotline: 1-800-448-4663
|
Web Resources: Drug Myths Dispelled, Drug & Alcohol Information
USA Drug Abuse Hotline: 1-800-662-4357
|
|
|
|
|
exceedinglyrare
Delicate Thing
Patron
|
Quote: from Micus at 1:11 pm on July 17, 2008
Quote: from exceedinglyrare at 8:21 am on July 17, 2008
No matter how long it lives and how old it grows, a cockroach will never discover a cure for cancer, find a way to reverse global warming, end world hunger or really do much besides scurry and carry disease. If left to nature, a fetus will grow and develop and has the potential to do all of those things and still have time to make a perfect grilled cheese sandwich at the end of the day. Potential is the difference here. 
That baby could also grow up to be Hitler. Or a homeless deranged drug addict. Or autistic. It doesn't really matter either way because if you just nip it in the bud we'll be sure it won't grow into anything at all. Edit: and actually, if left to nature, the baby would die hours after its born, unless it's cared for by the mother. Neglecting it pre or post partum would produce the same result. 
The point is that whether the fetus grows into Hitler or grows into Mother Theresa, it still has the potential to do good. Say what you will about babies growing up to be evil or rapists or whatever you please, but the fact remains that the potential for good is what separates aborting a fetus from stepping on a cockroach.
------- Let yourself be enchanted, You just might break through To ever ever after
|
|
|
TheOtherHorseman
Where shall wisdom be found?
Patron
Support Leader
|
Quote: from N e o at 1:24 am on July 17, 2008
Ever kill a scorpion? Cockroach? I don't see how it's any different than abortion. 
One might think that there is an inherent difference in that what one aborts is the same species as the aborter.
So why is it so wrong to abort an undeveloped baby? After all, just as a bug, it's defenseless. 
These two sentences, with their powers combined, do not make Captain Planet. They make an implied assertion that something which is defenseless is able to be rightly killed by virtue of its inability to protect itself. Do you operate in a world where the rightness or wrongness of something is contingent on how easy it is, or does that only apply to stomping bugs and aborting fetuses?
Just because a baby is one of our own does not mean we must "protect" it. After all, I don't see many people protecting bugs. 
Let me outline what you just said for you. ASSERTION: Just because a baby is one of our own does not mean we must "protect" it. SUPPORT FOR ASSERTION: I don't see many people protecting bugs (which aren't one of our own and therefore this in no way applies to the initial assertion that was made) Parenthetical notation mine, of course.
Discuss... 
discussed. Not a very well-phrased OP to start things off. Post edited at 11:19 am on July 17, 2008 by TheOtherHorseman
------- "My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings: Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!"
|
|
|
Micus
Like hell you will
Sustainer
|
Quote: from exceedinglyrare at 1:59 pm on July 17, 2008
Quote: from Micus at 1:11 pm on July 17, 2008
Quote: from exceedinglyrare at 8:21 am on July 17, 2008
No matter how long it lives and how old it grows, a cockroach will never discover a cure for cancer, find a way to reverse global warming, end world hunger or really do much besides scurry and carry disease. If left to nature, a fetus will grow and develop and has the potential to do all of those things and still have time to make a perfect grilled cheese sandwich at the end of the day. Potential is the difference here. 
That baby could also grow up to be Hitler. Or a homeless deranged drug addict. Or autistic. It doesn't really matter either way because if you just nip it in the bud we'll be sure it won't grow into anything at all. Edit: and actually, if left to nature, the baby would die hours after its born, unless it's cared for by the mother. Neglecting it pre or post partum would produce the same result. 
The point is that whether the fetus grows into Hitler or grows into Mother Theresa, it still has the potential to do good. Say what you will about babies growing up to be evil or rapists or whatever you please, but the fact remains that the potential for good is what separates aborting a fetus from stepping on a cockroach. 
Oh, that doesn't mean shit. Edit: oh, and TOH, we do protect bugs. Just ones that are in danger of becoming extinct. Post edited at 11:50 am on July 17, 2008 by Micus
------- Educators destroy your brain, but you don't know, so why care? Fagotto
|
11:47 am on July 17, 2008 | Joined Oct. 2004 | 1110 Days Active Join to learn more about Micus Connecticut, United States | Gay Male | 18936 Posts | 31129 Points
|
|
| |
|
|
exceedinglyrare
Delicate Thing
Patron
|
It doesn't mean shit to you. It means a great deal to other people. Perhaps you shouldn't impose your own values on others.
------- Let yourself be enchanted, You just might break through To ever ever after
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tearsinheaven
Connoisseur
|
I do not think you should put a bug on the same level as an unborn fetus. That said, I don't have a problem with abortion in an early stage of pregnancy if it's for the best of the mother. I had a slight pregnancy scare recently, and there was no doubt in my mind that I would get an abortion as soon as I could because I have a life planned for myself, and I wouldn't be able to properly support a child at this time.
------- RIP my dear friends gone in '06 --like the angel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic |  |
|